Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Keep Your Enemy on the Defense, Play on Their Side of the Field - Business, Sports, Politics, War

If you've ever played soccer, American football, or other similar sports with goals on each side of the field, then you probably realized it's much better to keep your offense pressing the defense of the opponent and keeping the game on their side of the court or field. In doing this you have a more likelihood of scoring a goal, and you are better able to prevent attacks on your own goal. Let's go ahead and stop right here, and call this theory; "the best defense is a good offense."

Next, there is something that is uniquely and inherently problematic about always being on the offense. When you are always on the offense you hone your skills on attack strategies, and you aren't very good at defense of strategies. Now then, the reason that we have a federal government is to pool the resources of the states for our common defense; in other words, to protect the American people from a foreign invasions or attack.

Since we are the greatest nation ever created in the history of mankind with the greatest wealth, and therefore currently we have the strongest and most powerful military in the solar system, it makes sense to position that military in such a way to provide for our common defense in such a robust fashion that no one would ever even attempt to think about attacking our goal on the side of the field or in this case on our side of the planet.

Americans don't ever believe that an enemy army might come into their cities or bomb their cities using advanced weaponry, but with our borders so open and unprotected - US citizens would be naïve to assume they are safe. The reality is no country is safe on a planet with humans organizing against your best interests. We have enemies of the United States abroad, which are coming together and uniting against us as their common enemy. Therefore, it is time not only to protect the European continent from their enemies, to protect our allies in Asia, the Middle East, and Africa, but also to protect our own borders.

You see, we have a lot to protect here, and being such a great nation we have a lot to lose. Therefore it is absolutely incomprehensible that the leadership of this great nation does not do more to provide an ironclad defense with every single possible technology known to humans and beyond to protect all we are and all we've built. Anything less than absolute 100% security for this nation is unacceptable. We did not come this far to throw it all away on a wing and a prayer. Yes, we should play on the other side of the field, but we should also have extra men on the field for our defense, because we are the ones making the rules and this is our game to play. We must play to win!

What is the Wisest Thing to Do in Times of Serious Financial Distress and Political Confusion?

In times of distress it is good and wise and sensible to call on the Lord God and know that He hears and answers. The Psalmist is in distress and I writing from the first Song of Ascent in Psalm 120. Do turn to it as there is wisdom and insight and discernment in these sentences.

Now, do not write this off as being totally irrelevant. Over these next weeks and months we are going to need this help and advice.

This calls for a special quality of leadership and such leadership is scarce in these present times.

But, and we need to know and keep remembering this, when we think of Jesus weeping over the city, and His cries at the foot of the mount of Olives in the Garden of Gethsemane, these significant spiritual incidents did not mean that the burden was lifted. Jesus wept and prayed and went on to face the Cross.

If God does not remove the burden, we know that He will give us the strength to carry that burden. Jesus was so often confronted with the unknown in His Humanity and no more so that when He rides down the Mount of Olives.

The Psalmist here has something very specific in mind as he refers to lying lips and deceitful tongues. Jesus had to face both these when He underwent that inquisition.

This man has obviously been the victim of lying and deceit. We can identify with that. It is always good to get away from that type of thing and that type of person.

He is in emotional pain and expresses it. He releases it and he does not bottle it up. He does not pretend that he did not have these feelings. He is a victim of all this. Jesus frequently expressed His feelings.

The writer turns away from the lies he has heard and approaches God and His truth. The more disillusioned we become with the world the more motivated we will be to pursue the Christian way.

Lies and deceit are commonplace. That is a painful fact we have to accept. That is not being negative. It is just being realistic. There are times when we have to have sufficient courage to face sin and even the consequences of sin and deal with the situation as it really is and not as we would like it to be!

But God has sharp arrows which he aims at those who persist in lying and deceitfulness. The Psalmist renounces all that and walks away from it, and that would be sensible practical advice for any man.

People's words can be like sharp arrows piercing our hearts, and there are times when God's sharp arrows, His judgments, touch those who touch and hurt us. I have seen this happen!

The people of Meshech lived between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea, and the people of Kedar were nomadic Arabs. The picture is that of a barbarian society which was strange and hostile, and not what God intended man to be.

People were warring against the Psalmist, and he knew he was a man of peace, and he is looking to see God at work in things present. This leader was different from everyone else!

His pain and upset is leading him from placing too much confidence in people to confidence in God. When leaders place their confidence in Almighty God they will be equipped to lead people in ways that many people really want to be led.

Sandy Shaw

Sandy Shaw is Pastor of Nairn Christian Fellowship, Chaplain at Inverness Prison, and Nairn Academy, and serves on The Children's Panel in Scotland, and has travelled extensively over these past years teaching, speaking, in America, Canada, South Africa, Australia, making 12 visits to Israel conducting Tours and Pilgrimages, and most recently in Uganda and Kenya, ministering at Pastors and Leaders Seminars, in the poor areas surrounding Kampala, Nairobi, Mombasa and Kisumu.

Power And Politics In Organisations

In every business power and politics will be used by its members for many and different reasons, either for their personal benefit or for the benefit of their business. If you want to succeed as a business owner and grow your business, being able to control power and politics in your business is a necessity for the survival of your business. To do that, you need to know why power and politics exists in organizations, why they are needed by managers and how to use them.

How Power and Politics exists

When involved in managerial work, you will certainly be involved in power and politics. People that use politics are able to influence other people and end up taking a greater share of the rewards made available. This exists both in the business world and our everyday life. Such people end up taking a greater share of the rewards simply because goods and services are scarce. We all have similar needs but few resources exist to satisfy everyone. For example, you want music in the office but i don't, both parties cannot have what they want and only the most powerful will get what he/she needs.

Each member of a business will either pursue rewards for himself or the department he belong to. Thus, a certain level of competition will exist in any organization and the members will use politics to get what they want. Those that use politics the best will usually have the higher power too. Thus, the ability to cope with politics when managing to manage is required.

Humans, are strategic animals, they have to cooperate and compete with others at the same time, both at work and outside it, in order to gain material and intangible rewards. This system creates an automatic control mechanism and a reward ladder at the same time. For example, new workers hired by a firm, have to work together in order to complete projects that can be accomplished only in groups, and at the same time each one is a competitor to each other because not everyone will be promoted or stay with the firm.

Why They Are Needed By Managers.

All businesses, small and big, will involve a high degree of ambiguity and uncertainty. This makes it impossible for anyone to have the full facts of a situation, understand what is going on at any given time or predict the outcome of any action taken. Managers depend on others and are required to use power and politics to influence and manipulate others central to their work so that an outcome they need can be achieved. It is hard for just one man/woman to undertake all the operations of the business. Depending on others, through direct orders, is not as effective because people feel pushed to do their work. Having people work because they actually want to and enjoy their work is much more productive and effective. Managers should also engage in micro politics to make sure that employees have a balanced competition and co-operation with each other, in order for productive and cooperative work to be achieved.

People, who are responsible and valuable in decreasing uncertainties in a business, will be well placed the next time a promotion comes up or a smart new office becomes available. Senior managers will listen to them and their influence and their likely further succeeding in micro political activity will be enhanced when dealing with a strategic uncertainty. They are well placed for achieving such successes, advance their power, and gain further rewards in the future. On the other hand, uncertainties change all the time, thus, people responsible for them change too and so does their place in the business. Also, such people may be replaced by other people who are equally able to handle uncertain situations. As a result, individuals currently in power may not continue to be in the future.

For this reason, People will not pursue power just for obtaining immediate resources like money, status and general 'comforts of life' but also to put themselves in a position whereby they will be able to obtain whatever they want in the future. To have power is the potential to do better in the future.

Methods Or Tactics For Micro Political Success:

Doing deals and making exchanges - Strategic exchanges, minor or major that play a part in advancing your career or life strategy.

Seeking patron - Establishing relationships with more powerful people.

Making alliances - Team up with selected colleagues.

Conspiring - Exploit certain positions you may have.

Mobilizing groups and assuming informal leadership roles.

Making strategic retreats - Taking a step backwards if identifying an immediate advantage potentially comprising long term success.

Using charm and skills of persuasion - Efforts to repair relationships.

Networking.

Talent spotting, selective recruitment and adopting proteges - Bringing talented people with you.

Gathering information that may actually or potentially be used against a rival or otherwise to advance one's interests.

Such methods, when used carefully and with good purposes, will help assure that employees will give the appropriate outcome that a manager wants from them. Also, good ethics should be taken in mind when trying to perform these methods since bad ethics might cause the business to create a bad name and future.

In conclusion, the main thing to consider is that you need to be able to control people in your business in order for it to be a success. You will highly depend on other people so that business operations will be completed. If you cannot control what employees offer to your business, it will be hard for your business to grow and succeed, if not fail. For this reason, it is important to know how to control your employees and the best approach will be through micro politics to encourage people rather than giving direct orders, which may even slow the performance of employees.

Machiavellian Tactics: Hidden Persuasion in Business and Politics Today

Just over fifty years ago Vance Packard provoked worldwide alarm when he published The Hidden Persuaders, a book which exposed the ruthless way in which advertisers were using covert psychological techniques to manipulate our thoughts, fears and purchasing decisions. The book sold over a million copies, and for a while made the public aware of its vulnerability to the clandestine use of subliminal stimulation and Freudian depth psychology. The hue and cry that Packard caused has long since abated - but we're still being bombarded every day by the same coercive techniques. These are being subtly and incessantly applied, not only by advertisers, but also by politicians, newspapers, press agents, slogan writers, spin doctors and public relations consultants. Our subconscious minds are under constant attack, bombarded with feel-good stimuli designed to encourage us to buy products we don't need, won't use and often can't afford.

This, of course, is nothing new. Many regard Niccolo Machiavelli as the founding father of political thought control. He was the strategic adviser to the Florentine Republic in the early sixteenth century, and was one of the first to compile a written guide for rulers on the acquisition and deployment of political power. His book The Prince circulated privately during his lifetime, and was only published after his death because it was thought that its advice on the use of cunning, deceit and guile was far too dangerous to fall into dissident hands. 'It would be best to be both loved and feared', is one of the instructions he offers would-be rulers. 'But since the two rarely come together, anyone compelled to choose will find greater security in being feared than in being loved.' The book was banned by the Catholic Church, who added it to its Index Liborum Prohibitorum, while no doubt keeping several copies in the Vatican library for the guidance of senior members of the all-powerful Roman Curia. It became one of the bibles of the Founding fathers of the American colonies, John Adams finding its advice invaluable, particularly the practical guidance it gives on the centralization of power and the control of rebel factions.

Many writers have developed the art of Machiavellian cunning. One of the earliest was the Spaniard Balthasar Gracian, who wrote The Art of Worldly Wisdom, which was published in 1637 and widely distributed throughout Europe. The book offers three hundred tips on how to achieve personal and public success. Much of this wise advice relates to personal life style change, and covers the same ground as the vast genre of contemporary self-help manuals. But, like Machiavelli, Gracian also provides suggestions for manipulating people. Here, for instance, are four of his tips, taken at random and suitably paraphrased. Axiom 5: 'Aim to make people dependent on you. The astute person prefers to have people needing them than thanking them. Keep their hope alive without entirely satisfying it, for then you'll preserve their dependency.' Axiom 7: 'Avoid surpassing your superiors. All victories generate hate, and to provoke such feelings in your seniors is foolish and self-destructive.' Axiom 17: 'Vary your pattern of behaviour, otherwise your rivals will be able to anticipate your course of action and frustrate your plans. It's easy to kill a bird that follows a straight course, not so one that twists and turns.' And Axiom 77: 'Be all things to all men. Observe, and mimic, their moods and mannerisms. Follow their lead. Be learned with the learned, and saintly with the saintly. This is the way to gain their sympathy and support.'

These are the techniques which politicians employ today, usually with the help of spin doctors trained in the art of psychological persuasion and Machiavellian cunning. It's no coincidence that the founding father of American PR, Edward L. Bernays, was the nephew of Sigmund Freud. One of his first tasks when he set up in practice was to give the Machiavellian art a more benign public face. This he did with great success, encouraging the man-in-the-street to think in terms of 'public relations' rather than 'propaganda.' But despite these attempts at rebranding, the work of the modern spin doctors is still largely devoid of ethical standards. This was shown on 9/11, the day when the Twin Towers of New York's Trade Centre were raised to the ground by al Qaeda terrorists. Seizing the opportunity this presented, Jo Moore, one of the UK government's press officers, sent a message to her political chiefs telling them: 'It's a good day to bury bad news.' (Her actual words were slightly different, but equally callous and unprincipled.)

These mind benders are hell bent on pulling the wool over our eyes. They're offering us not facts, but romantic fictions. Their power is immense; their presence all-pervasive. In Washington DC today there are over seventeen thousand lobbyists, promoting the interests of pressure groups ranging from those of large pharmaceutical companies, to anti-abortion campaigners and the National Rifle Association, which wants to ensure that every American has the right to carry a gun. Last year these movers and shakers received nearly $3.5 billion in funds, which doesn't include the amount they paid directly into the campaign accounts of Federal candidates. Unless we're vigilant, we'll be the victims of constant subliminal manipulation. Our hard won freedom will be lost, the moment we let others dictate our thoughts and purchasing decisions.

Courts and Politics - There is Supposed to Be a Separation, But I Cannot See it Anymore!

There are three branches of our government in the United States of America, and the Supreme Court is the law of the land, and there is supposed to be a separation between the other branches of government (legislative, executive). Unfortunately, this Supreme Court has become far too political, and I fear they are leaning us towards socialist tendencies. And many of the cases they decide to take, and the decisions they render, seem to coincide far too often political events, and the timing makes it all suspect.

Okay so, you probably want me to give you a couple of examples, because perhaps you are a liberal leaning socialist, and you want to make sure that whatever I say comes with examples, so you can blow it out of proportion, take my words out of context, and to defeat my premise, or theory. The only problem is you're not smart enough to do that, because if you believe in socialist societies, and that very fact, well, it proves that you are lacking in IQ level [in my opinion], or you really don't care about the United States of America. [In my opinion, which is CYA so you can't sue me.]

Below are two examples, they are very recent examples;

Gay Marriage Ban was overturned just before President Obama is scheduled to be in Los Angeles for a Fundraiser.

Arizona immigration law parts and clauses ruled unconstitutional day before protests and it was supposed to go into effect.

Still, these are only two examples, and it is occurring more and more often. Worse, I hereby charge the US Supreme Court with abandoning their sworn duty to uphold the US Constitution, and therefore have come to the conclusion that their administering of "The Law of the Land" has been compromised. What does this mean? It means that there is no longer justice in the United States of America, it has been corrupted.

Now then, I love my country, or obviously I wouldn't be writing this, but when the leadership of this nation is unfit to lead, and they are allowed to nominate members to the Supreme Court, and the legislative branch of our government approves those nominations, we find that we have one political party which has infiltrated all three branches of government, and we no longer have checks and balances.

The other problem is government is moving too fast, and when the Supreme Court is in cahoots with a fast-moving socialist-style political push in our government, we have a problem that we should all be concerned about. Now then, one could say that everything is fine, but that wouldn't be the reality, and the further this goes down the road without the pendulum swinging the other way, the harder it is going to be to fix in the future to keep our nation safe and sane.

Further, if we are going to run our country more like a straight democracy than the Republic that it is, and if we are going to continually elect populist-like presidents, then eventually our country will be run by mob rule, and anytime we get a large group of people protesting in the streets, the Supreme Court will do whatever it takes to calm them down, along with all the politicians.

This is a slippery slope that we are going down, and if we continue down this path, we will end up like many of the countries in Europe, and last time I checked they weren't doing so well. The United States of America is a great country, because it has a representative government, and yet, now we find that our politicians are willing to and are obliging the mass media which incites the mobs, and if our Supreme Court is willing to do the same, then no one is safe, nor can the citizenry, businesses, or future generations know what will happen next.

Such uncertainty in society and civilization, in economics and industry, or in politics and our court system cannot bring forth the desired results for the continuation of such a great nation.

Indeed, I see a storm on the horizon, one which no one is prepared for, and one which our government is either afraid of or will not take the necessary steps to protect the American people, rather making the potential eventuality much worse.

Is this where freedom goes astray, are we living in a society which is doomed to repeat, even when the obvious is right before our eyes? And who are these characters on stage, these people we call leaders, these podium pushing politicians who claim they are the answer?

They are the problem, not the answer.

Please consider all this.

Biblical Law and Political Freedom

On Sunday evening March 21, 2010 the House of Representatives voted to accept the national health-care bill passed by the Senate late last year. Once the legislation was signed by the President, it became the law of the land. This is another step in the effort to impose the religion of Man on the United States and to marginalize Christianity. Don't be fooled; it is not a political battle that is raging but a spiritual battle. It is a battle of worldviews concerning the nature of salvation. On one hand we have the belief that salvation comes about through law. On the other hand we have the truth that salvation is by grace alone. It is the nature of anti-God, anti-Christian government to seek to replace salvation in Christ with salvation by law. This describes our current circumstance and we need to understand what is happening if we hope to turn the tide.

In imperial Rome the health of the people was the highest law. This is because a government that sees human reason as the highest authority will enforce positive law in order to bring about utopia. "Positive law" refers to legislation that compels specific behavior (rather than restrict certain actions), in order to achieve redemption. As R.J. Rushdoony wrote, "If the law is positive in its function and if the health of the people is the highest law, then the state has total jurisdiction to compel the total health of the people." This means that "everything becomes a part of the state's jurisdiction because everything can potentially contribute to the health or the destruction of the people." Therefore the law becomes unlimited and the state unlimited. This is positive law because it becomes the business of the state not to control evil and subdue it but to control all men in all areas of life. Thus, "basic to every totalitarian regime is a positive concept of the function of law."

We have arrived at this point not due to a preordained failure of the Gospel but because of a reluctance on the part of the Church to embrace God's law in its legitimate role of maintaining order in society. In other words we have come perilously close to a mind-set that says "let sin abound that grace may abound all the more" (Romans 3:8, 6:1). We are guilty of playing politics. We are guilty of ignoring our nation's Christian heritage. We are guilty of denying the authority of Christ in every area of life. We are guilty of tossing the law of God onto the trash heap of history. The irony is that biblical law applied in its proper new testament context maximizes individual liberty while Man's law minimizes it.

Top 7 Similarities of Business and War

Business Strategy and capturing market share is somewhat similar in many regards to war strategy. How so you ask? Well below are the similarities listed for your consideration. And before I introduce them to you, I am not suggesting war is good or evil. I believe it is merely a formality of political impasse amongst humans and good or bad is irrelevant, as it just is.

Surely it would be best to have no wars and killing ones own species seems a bit problematic and nevertheless if you enemy is trying to kill you sometimes the defense of such leads to unfortunate circumstances.

Now then here are some parallels of business and war below and perhaps they will be of value to you for philosophical discussion?

1.) In war you have an opponent and your opponent wants what you have or you are trying to get what they have; market share.

2.) In war you fight many battles over the course of the war in many territories or markets.

3.) In war intelligence of your opponent is very important and in business you need to estimate you competitions next move.

4.) In war there are many aspect you need to control such as the air, ground and sea; in business you are also interested in controlling multiple market segments and servicing those customers better.

5.) In war you must be efficient with your supplies; such a fuel, food and such; in business efficiency means higher profits.

6.) In war you must hold the territories that you capture. In business you must maintain market share once you achieve it.

7.) In war you must defend your army and your country. In business you must defend your brand name and price points, by using many different methods.

Next time you are thinking about business strategy, winning markets and market share and then defending what you have achieved consider if you will the relationships to war strategy. In doing so you may see the game from another perspective and this may help your business. Think on this in 2006.

Mixing Business and Spirituality

We don't often think about how we mix business and spirituality, mostly because the two don't seem to share any common bonds. Business is about driving revenue, boosting sales, and making money. Spirituality is about finding a moral center, a place in this world, and what we can do to elevate our own sense of inner peace. Yet it is important, especially within our modern fast-paced culture, to find a balance between business and spirituality.

Can business and spirituality coexist?

The question has been raised time and time again and depending on your personal background and upbringing, you may find completely different answers than someone else. We have come to understand modern business as being a cutthroat, take-no-prisoners ideology and showing any compassion for others or a sense of limits to what you are willing to do to win at business as is considered a weakness.

Yet nations around the world have been founded on the foundations of spirituality. Some might call this religion, but the two are closely related and it seems as though mankind alters religion into a political tool when it suits them, though it is the spirituality that underlies those beliefs that define these nations.

As younger generations grow up, go to school and college, earn their degrees and then enter the workforce, they have been inundated with messages about the importance of money. It drives them, it motivates them, and ultimately it becomes their compass in life. While this trend is certainly not new to the world of business and entrepreneurship, it is fast becoming something of a plague in modern society.

Why can't business and spirituality coexist? It has happened with some of the best and strongest companies in the world. The basic groundwork for dealing with this issue comes down to each individual and the importance they place on making money.

Boosting business is not evil

Just because you have a strong desire to elevate your business, make it more profitable, and to become a leader doesn't make you an evil person. There are many businessmen and businesswomen who have worked hard and become successful while holding onto their strong sense of spirituality. It all comes down to a basic choice.

How important it the bottom line to you and your business? What are your limits when it comes to achieving your goals for your business? If you are a spiritual person yet you wish to make a million dollars with your business in five years, there's nothing wrong with that. Unless you begin to conduct yourself in a way that leads you off the path you have chosen for your spiritual strength and salvation.

Merging business and spirituality requires foresight, a plan, and being able to hold fast to that plan. When you do that, there is nothing that can stop you from achieving your dreams.

Beware of Business and Marketing Based Article-Social Networking Websites

Sometimes it seems no one in the younger generation seems to know how to work anymore, instead they all try to come up with the latest Internet Social Networking Scheme. Indeed, they really do not ever create anything new, just slight variations along similar themes. For instance, the other day someone emails me and wants me to provide them with 100s of Business and Marketing articles. And as the most prolific online article writer in human history, that should not be too difficult for me right?

Well, sure, I could do it, but why would I provide fresh quality content to a brand new website that is unproven, not even listed in the search engines yet and do all that for free? I.e. What's in it for me? So, I asked the gentleman and here is what he responded, probably another form email that he sends to everyone. Typical non-personal gibberish:

Hi Lance,

Let me explain a little about Our New Website to give you a better understand of the site.

Our New Website (launching in two weeks) is set up as a portal for professionals in 3 areas, which are Marketing & Sales, Accounting & Finance, and Small Business Owners & Startups. Professionals in these areas can come to Schlitzel and read daily articles, read blogs, participate in discussions, find out about the latest jobs, and participate in groups. Each profession is separated so that users view only one profession at a time to ensure each member sees the content that is most important to them. Basically, it is a one stop shop for professionals to get everything they need in their profession.

The articles section is a major area on the site. Each weekday we feature one article for each profession. The article should be based on any marketing profession topic. The author is also given a section to write about their background and their name is hyperlinked to the user profile on the site.

We encourage viewers to leave comments on the article and engage in a discussion. The goal of the article is to provide profession related content to our users. In return, we want our authors to be seen as industry experts leading to increased exposure for the author. You can see an example article that I posted at [URL was here]. The site usually requires a password so you will see a banner at the top asking for you to sign in. This banner will not be shown if you are logged in.

The only thing we ask from the authors is:

  1. the article is related to the profession and provides value to the user
  2. no blatant advertising in the article such as discount offers, text links, etc.
  3. the article needs to be original content written by the author. It can be a rephrased article from a previous post, but it can not [sic] be a duplicate repost as this will hurt our page-rank from Google.

Please let me know if you have any questions. We are looking for our first contributors now. Would you like to contribute?
---- ---- ---- ----

So, what is a polite way to say "Heck No!" Let's see now, would I like to contribute content for free to help this guy build his website and make money. Mind you, it's a brand new site, no traffic and virtually not recognized at all by anyone. Would you want to build someone else's website instead of your own? What's in it for you? In this case Nothing - think about it.

Change Management and Politics

Each time we throw a scoundrel out of public office we see the problems of disruption in organizational capital and in business we too see this all the time with management turnover, mergers or simply normal attrition. In the Public Sector it can be far worse as one team or staff is not re-elected by their constituents and a team is voted into office.

Yet the issues are the same really and imagine the disruption when your entire team is thrown out of a corporation, an on-going company and a new team is put in place. Fine they get there and then what? Exactly the problem indeed, now what.

Well in the private sector this often happens and then everything is disrupted, bad decisions are made and a new person comes into office, with a whole new staff and team. Guess who really loses in all of this? You guessed it the taxpayers and citizens. More waster, inefficiencies and it takes months for them to settle into place, meanwhile nothing new gets done and they are not able to make good on their campaign promises at all?

They can't and if they force the issues, we see immediately the laws of unintended consequences. Change Management and Politics and politics needs to be done much smoother and the transition much more controlled if the citizens are to be served properly. Please consider this in 2006.

Religion and Politics Don't Mix - a Modern Fairy Tale

The first mention or allusion to 'the separation of powers' or as we now say, 'the separation of church and state' is also its best definition. "Jesus answering said unto them, render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's. And they marvelled at him." (Mk 12:17) This definition clearly says we can deal seriously with both but the two are not mutually exclusive.

Ecclesiastical and civil powers are not ever supposed to enter a marriage but they have and always will have an ongoing relationship until the last day of time. But on the subject of a marriage between them we have a case today born between the admonitions of the Wisdom of Solomon that says "there is no new thing under the sun." (Ecc 1:9) and mans unfaltering proclivity to forget the past and repeat his worst behavior.

The last time the powers married was during the Dark Ages. Beliefs that skirted outside of church doctrine had to be prosecuted and punished because ecclesiastical powers were also the civil authority. Doctrine wrong; you must be punished. Not only did this make a terrible marriage but scientific inquiry, political growth and life itself were constantly suppressed and severely stifled.

You would think we would have learned the lesson. Now that the world view is largely secular we are once again repeating the past. If you hold a creation view of man you may lose all credibility and perhaps even your livelihood. You must now submit your children to a compulsory secular education for not less than 12 years which now teaches revisionist history that ignores, denies or argues against the fact that America and Europe were founded on Biblical and Christian principles. It's a new dark ages with the so called 'enlightened ones' at the helm of the repression.

The hypocrisy becomes even viler when what's offered to placate the repressed is a call to tolerance and diversity in the new PC polished public dialogue. It's a sort of 'let's lump so we don't bump' approach that reeks of repression but with a candy coating for those who accept PC props as a substitute for true wisdom, free speech or real scientific inquiry.

With the help of secular academicians and organizations like the ACLU, religion, biblical principles and all allusion to them is regarded as extraneous if not outright foolishness. It has become stylish to belittle the faithful and berate the preachers, prophets and biblical scholars that were once held in high regard. Its now vogue to be rogue and stand alone in ones own self assurance, raised up and well taught in the ways of the world, not easily moved.

We are taught to live at our peak but never be meek, we're the bold prodigal standing alone as hunger draws the skin to the bone, bellowing and boasting through teeth and tusks but not far from eating the husks, pride circles the heart until we incline to join with the stranger, and dine with the swine. (Lk 15:11f)

We would rather not see ourselves as prodigals but more as prodigies spawned of our highly touted enlightenment. We have been spinning the idea of lightning hitting the primordial ooze so long now that it is simply un-cool to entertain the idea of divine light touching the heart and thereby healing the muddled world view that makes up the encroaching reprobation of our minds.

The brightest minds are taken with tinsel towns x-rated view of America and now our legislators want to green light hundreds of deviant behaviors' so we can enjoy the full spectrum. We are urged not to waste time pondering the fine line between laxity and licentiousness, the glutton and the gourmet, suggestion and indoctrination. We are so busy handing out awards and recognition to Hollywood's haloed hacks and celebrities that we haven't noticed that the great imaginary rocket ship we are beckoned to board is not pointing to the stars but is aimed directly toward the ground.

Along come the social tinkerers to the Congress and White House with promises of 'change' and renewed prosperity and a much better deal than ever offered before. It's a sugar daddy government that mocks the tradition of hard work, self reliance and entrepreneurial pursuit all the while they spend millions on ad campaigns to assure us that the tinkering will result in better America, a changed America. Who needs to check the authority, the efficacy, the cost or the practicality of the proposed changes when the ads are assuring us that "it is time." Is there ever a time to turn our backs on the hard won lessons learned in our past?

We are busy denying our past and actively disconnecting our nation from the great eternal power source our founders told us we should use as our only source. Now, we are running on battery power. We are connected to the two posts, Tinsel Town on the left coast and Tinker Town on the east; but this battery is running low.

Lights are dimming in the drain of power and a flickering and twisted reading of the gauges in the great democratic engine are misleading the nation to believe it can go streaming down the road this way for many more miles to come. The gages are instilling us with a false and twisted comfort but they are wrong.

Twisted comfort is derived from twisted truth. Is it the Godly who are foolish? David the ancient psalmist, prophet and king says oh contraire; "The fool hath said in his heart, there is no God." (Ps 14:1)

As truth loses its premium fewer Americans will notice that in the bare knuckles contest between religion and culture, religion will always lose. But in the contest between a political answer and prophetic utterance, politics will always lose. There is no battle between ideology and theology; there is no contest.

Prophecy is not a view point, a bit of social tinkering or the shifting tide of public opinion. Prophecy is pre-written history. But if a nation can blithely ignore the vision of its founders; will it be likely to heed those who foresee its demise or those who are urging its citizens to take stock and return to the faith of their Fathers?

The correlation between faith in God and involvement in civil discourse, politics and government is as old as civilization and when it is finally severed it spells the doom of civilization. In ancient times the prophet and the king interacted for the benefit of a nation. Now we sit pixilated by presidents, pundits, professors and secular prognosticators who tell us we are surely on the right path, without those troublesome allusions to accountability or an Almighty God.

When the final world ruler known as the antichrist successfully crushes all religions and the practice of them it will not result in the imaginary euphoric world of John Lennon's world with no religions. It will result in the battle of Armageddon and the re-entrance of the Lord Jesus Christ into the affairs and governments of men.

The description of his entrance betrays any notion they he returns in meekness to negotiate with rulers for a more loving and better way to have a world. Scripture says the meek and lowly Jesus will rule 1,000 years before eternity actually begins, but with a rod of iron. "And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God." (Rev 19:15)

C.S. Lewis said "Reality, in fact, is always something you couldn't have guessed. That's one of the reasons I believe Christianity. It's a religion you couldn't have guessed."

Who would guess that in the end it won't be democracy, communism, socialism, fascism or any 'ism' at all that wins out. World government will once again revert to a monarchy. The confusion of misrule and civilizations failed attempts at world government will be remedied not just by having a new ruler but by one who is divinely appointed. There will be no war, hunger, sickness or death. And in case you missed the point, civil and ecclesiastical powers will finally be married once and for all, a marriage made in heaven.

In the interim don't delude yourself, religion; religious figures and Christ himself have always had to play an interactive part with civil and political powers. The interweaving of both is the only hope of keeping a bland and often tasteless world from the mediocrity of living in a salt less if not hopeless society.

Civil and religious figures will go on in peace or conflict with each other until one is not tolerated and that is what precipitates the final fall of man. Until then Moses will have his Pharaoh, Elijah his Ahab, Jesus his Pilate, Paul his King Agrippa and Nero, and the last days believers their antichrist to deal with.

As long as discourse is alive and morality is tweaked by mans refusal to leave God out of the civil and political equation there will be hope. The path mankind is choosing today will most assuredly end in a brief period of deep and pervasive darkness for the world that culminates in the dawning of the eternal morning star.

Separation of Business and Politics

In the heat of the election season and as a life-long political junkie, I can't wait for election night. It is always one of the biggest nights of the year around my house. Glued to multiple TV's, tuned to every station (and now the Internet) I watch the returns roll in. Depending upon your investment in the campaign, the emotional highs and lows intensify. It's even better to be at a party. Some friends ask why I don't wait until the next morning to read the headlines. Would you turn off the TV before the end of the big game and find out the score tomorrow? This is an important political year full of excitement, so it's easy to be engaged. We're probably finding more people expressing their opinions about politics than ever before. But what about doing this at the workplace?

Political expression comes in a lot of forms. I have to admit I got a little uneasy when I pulled into my office parking lot and saw a bumper sticker that said something derogatory about meat-eaters. Now, I don't have anything against my vegetarian friends, yet I do like a nice steak now and then. What might people think about the opinions displayed at work? Might they be offended?

What about expressing strong political opinions in a small office environment to co-workers and clients? Unless you're working in the campaign office or at the legislature, this might have its limits. I did a little research on how well the workplace tolerates political discussions. We know that public employees (and many who work for private companies) have to adhere to specific guidelines. Those rules may include personal use of company computers and the wearing or distribution of political materials. In general, private, at-will employers have a great deal of latitude in how they manage their workplaces and what political tone they choose to set.

Even if the flexibility exists for employers, politics in the workplace can bring about workplace politics. There is some basic etiquette one can use to keep tensions down. How you handle yourself may depend if you're in management or not. There appears to be a tolerance for conversations among co-workers, but managers are held to a different standard. A national survey conducted in May and June 2007 by Harris Interactive, found that nearly one out of four U.S. workers says they are uncomfortable when their top managers openly express their political preferences at work. More than a quarter of those polled said they don't fit in with their company's culture in terms of politics. The survey found generational differences between younger and older workers regarding talking politics at work. Seventy-six percent of younger employees (age 18-34) would share their political views, compared to 64% of those age 50+. Eight-four percent of younger employees were comfortable telling their boss which candidates they support. This is compared to 68% of older workers who would do the same.

So do you tip-toe around your passion for R's or D's? How can you inspire an excitement for politics at work while not creating unnecessary tensions? At a very minimum, you can create an environment that values voting. It is not inappropriate to inquire is employees or coworkers need registration information. If the outcome of certain ballot measures could affect your business or clients that could also be acceptable for discussion. Alerting family, friends and co-workers to important debates, forums or community meetings may also create involvement and engagement without appearing bias. If you're in a politically charged environment that can be exciting, but what's most important is that you vote, your vote is yours, it's private and it's important. I hope you'll mail in your ballot and be part of this great process. Remember, on election night don't call, I'll be busy, unless you're having a party.....

Sunday, April 8, 2012

Avoiding Business Politics Can Derail Career Success

Survival of the Savvy: High-Integrity Political Tactics for Career and Company Success

Authors: Rick Brandon Ph.D. and Marty Seldman Ph.D.

Survival of the Savvy was on my bookshelf about a month before I had the privilege of meeting the author, Rick Brandon, at a leadership conference in San Francisco where we both were speaking. Our talks were at different times so I was able to attend Rick's presentation.

That was when I realized how important this book could be to all the women I work with who are sometimes underestimated, overlooked, and denied proper recognition for their accomplishments because they abhor and avoid anything associated with the word politics. If this sounds like you, you are not alone.

Survival of the fittest! That is what it feels like in the work world sometimes. I know how tough it can be. I have worked in business since the mid 1980's where I have witnessed political games of all sorts - power struggles, back biting, turf wars, and blind ambition.

Reading the book you will learn that the stereotypical image of the term 'political', that usually is thought of as overly political and at time unethical behaviors are definitely not what the authors are recommending.

Survival of the Savvy describes the political style continuum that ranges from the less political type who believe hard work, facts, and good ideas are enough to the overly political individuals driven by self-interest.

Brandon and Seldman suggest a high integrity middle ground (aka ethical and more palatable,) approach to politics that even the most politically averse can employ. They call it the green light/safe travel zone. This vital balance is neither too political nor politically naive.

Power and politics are not dirty words. You can promote yourself with integrity. These are important messages in the book for all women in business and especially for those in the traditionally less political career tracks who want to advance to leadership positions - women in science, R&D, Information Technology, engineering, and other technical fields.

The authors successfully help readers, who hate the thought of workplace politics, reframe how they think about power and politics. They offer useful and practical advice even for the political novice.

The further you advance, the more vulnerable you are if you remain politically naive. The authors claim in their experience ethical political skills are a leadership competency.

If you want to get ahead, but are so opposed to the concept of politics and to any of the ideas in the book the day will come when your subject matter and expert technical status are no longer good enough for you to advance. Your career will plateau. Shunning even high integrity, ethical politics can mean you are destined to succeed only in a job in the ranks below management and leadership. If you do progress into management you are at risk to derail in all but the most non-political cultures.

Reading and applying the information in the book is not easy but worthwhile for all who want to land the top jobs and earn the income they deserve. If you feel frustrated or have plateaued in your career advancement, it may be a political blind spot and reading this book can help.

Although not a book written specifically for women, the authors offer 'political' success strategies especially relevant for women.

Jean Caton is a Career, Business, and Life Coach, Speaker, and Virtual Educator. She has over 20 years of business experience working in four Fortune 500 companies. Now, as an entrepreneur, Jean combines her practical experience in business, with her education and training, to coach, teach, inspire, and empower others. She invites you to visit her website to learn more. http://www.JeanCaton.net

Jean helps women move to the top in their careers or small business. Her clients strengthen their business savvy and expertise and develop the self-confidence required to advance to increasingly higher levels in their organization or business. Take a taste of what Jean can offer you by requesting a complimentary telephone coaching conversation. http://www.JeanCaton.net You may also get a sample of Jean's expertise by joining one of her complimentary preview teleclasses.

Saturday, April 7, 2012

Global Business World - Three Strategies You Should Consider

This article introduced three strategies of globalization business and analyzed the relations among them; then offers some essential decisive-related questions for strategy scheme and decision making; and at last summarizes some issues for executives to think about.

The globalization directly affects the competitive situation of the world, it is necessary to make good use of strategies and reduce risks in order to establish and lift the power of business competition.

Because competition is emerging in very much different markets, today's businesses are forced to be globalized in non-traditional ways. Before enterprises make a presence in markets just so that they know what competitors in that market are doing and use it as a window to look into new trends and new competitive strategies. These are just some of the reasons that require businesses today to have a global mindset-it is an essential factor for survival.

Followed are three strategies for globalization business.

The first is to adjust measures according to local conditions of target area, and it's the essence of all global business strategies. There are differences in terms of costs for different raw materials, labor power, working skills, and institutional infrastructures. The decision makers with a global perspective, have to recognize the differences across countries and account for them in the strategic decisions. Those decisions may have to do with customers, raw materials, manufacturing, capital funds, market capacity or any of the dimensions on which strategic plans are made. Thus, a company in a labor-intensive business that fails to account for labor cost differentials across countries.

On the contrast, the second strategy is to fully use the similarities across countries. Because there are significant similarities, it means that products, skills and investments that are made or developed for one market have the potential to be leveraged in multiple geographic markets. The similarities imply that a product created or developed in some market can be sold in another market without having to be reinvented. What that enables a business to do, for example, is to use its research and development dollars by selling a proven product from one market, usually the company's home market, to different countries. This advantage is particularly significant in businesses like pharmaceuticals that are research and development intensive.

The above two strategies of similarities and differences across markets are not opposite ends of one scale. Rather, they are complementary dimensions and should both be leveraged. An executive needs to ask what the similarities and differences are across markets. It then becomes a matter of strategic choice whether to exploit similarities first or differences first or both simultaneously, in order to take advantages of the global potential that lies inherent in each business.

The third of globalization business strategy is about the fundamental choices. Typically, these decisions involve four considerations: operations and costs; customers and markets; competition; government policies. Does the product have a committed champion? Can a product sold in multiple markets increase competitive advantage in home market? Are the competitors in that particular market already global and therefore, does the company needs to have a presence in multiple markets to be able to defend against the competitors? Sometimes, answering these questions in the context of a company's organization is as much an administrative as an economic and strategic process.


Ultimately, an executive must make sure that the company has a presence in multiple markets and view it like a global game of chess. He must coordinate competitive moves across countries; consciously decide in which country to launch a product, where the global competitors are strongest, where the cost structure is lowest, and where the business is likely to get the quickest market feedback. Then he must decide how to launch the product in other markets and how to manage pricing in multiple markets. It is the global chess game rather than individual market share games being played in local area. Unless all elements fit together, it is difficult to develop the competitive global business.

Good News For Small Business Owners, Internet Marketing May Help

There are millions of visitors online daily, interacting with one another. Thousands of websites created within weeks. This means there are more opportunities created online, in such a rate that you couldn't have imagined ten years ago.

The internet has changed itself for the recent years to a stage where online shopping is possible, comparing products between companies is easily done. More experts are sharing their area of knowledge online, providing insights to one another. There are certain limitations as well, you can't simply buy a diamond online and have it shipped over to your home.

Hundreds of buying/selling websites such as ebay are created online, providing consumers platforms to exchange information, making comparisons and buy or sell products online. It will become highly possible that businesses that fail to capture the attention of its online consumers will lose out to its competitors.

There are hundreds of corporates setting up their website online to create a strong presence as well. They are often motivated by the idea of creating more value for their customers and thus creating more profits online. Sometimes, companies found themselves being able to cut cost and start shifting certain operations online.

However, there are some issues that you will have to take care of when doing businesses online. Consumers are troubled by the problem of scams and phishing websites, the banks are trying hard to hunt down these trouble makers. Same goes to your websites as well, you will need to create a professional corporate image online and get third parties to verify your website as legitimate.

There is an increase of computer users and website visitors, the idea of shopping online is becoming a norm. This presents you, the seller, a larger market, and the buyers, being able to make the smart decision to purchase online. Furthermore, there are lots of reviews, consumer reports and testimonials that customers can refer to.

You will first need to do in depth research in terms of your numbers, operating costs, potential profits that you can make online, initial start up fee online, all these have to be taken into consideration when you want to shift your business online, either entirely or partially.

You need to understand that there may be hundreds of websites selling similar products as you, you will need to create your own unique selling point before being able to create a legitimate online success.
After doing all the research, finding partners to start your online business is critical if you don't have internet marketing knowledge. You will need to do find strategic partners to help you pave the way into the unknown world of internet marketing.

Separation of Business and Politics

In the heat of the election season and as a life-long political junkie, I can't wait for election night. It is always one of the biggest nights of the year around my house. Glued to multiple TV's, tuned to every station (and now the Internet) I watch the returns roll in. Depending upon your investment in the campaign, the emotional highs and lows intensify. It's even better to be at a party. Some friends ask why I don't wait until the next morning to read the headlines. Would you turn off the TV before the end of the big game and find out the score tomorrow? This is an important political year full of excitement, so it's easy to be engaged. We're probably finding more people expressing their opinions about politics than ever before. But what about doing this at the workplace?

Political expression comes in a lot of forms. I have to admit I got a little uneasy when I pulled into my office parking lot and saw a bumper sticker that said something derogatory about meat-eaters. Now, I don't have anything against my vegetarian friends, yet I do like a nice steak now and then. What might people think about the opinions displayed at work? Might they be offended?

What about expressing strong political opinions in a small office environment to co-workers and clients? Unless you're working in the campaign office or at the legislature, this might have its limits. I did a little research on how well the workplace tolerates political discussions. We know that public employees (and many who work for private companies) have to adhere to specific guidelines. Those rules may include personal use of company computers and the wearing or distribution of political materials. In general, private, at-will employers have a great deal of latitude in how they manage their workplaces and what political tone they choose to set.

Even if the flexibility exists for employers, politics in the workplace can bring about workplace politics. There is some basic etiquette one can use to keep tensions down. How you handle yourself may depend if you're in management or not. There appears to be a tolerance for conversations among co-workers, but managers are held to a different standard. A national survey conducted in May and June 2007 by Harris Interactive, found that nearly one out of four U.S. workers says they are uncomfortable when their top managers openly express their political preferences at work. More than a quarter of those polled said they don't fit in with their company's culture in terms of politics. The survey found generational differences between younger and older workers regarding talking politics at work. Seventy-six percent of younger employees (age 18-34) would share their political views, compared to 64% of those age 50+. Eight-four percent of younger employees were comfortable telling their boss which candidates they support. This is compared to 68% of older workers who would do the same.

So do you tip-toe around your passion for R's or D's? How can you inspire an excitement for politics at work while not creating unnecessary tensions? At a very minimum, you can create an environment that values voting. It is not inappropriate to inquire is employees or coworkers need registration information. If the outcome of certain ballot measures could affect your business or clients that could also be acceptable for discussion. Alerting family, friends and co-workers to important debates, forums or community meetings may also create involvement and engagement without appearing bias. If you're in a politically charged environment that can be exciting, but what's most important is that you vote, your vote is yours, it's private and it's important. I hope you'll mail in your ballot and be part of this great process. Remember, on election night don't call, I'll be busy, unless you're having a party.....

Tuesday, April 3, 2012

Top 7 Similarities of Business and Politics

Politics and Business are so similar in many ways. Sure politics is much dirtier and generally played by less ethical individuals and yet the similarities are often uncanny. Perhaps a brief point-by-point comment on this subject will open a new perspective on this subject. Below are a few similarities to help the thinking juices flow and allow some conceptual thoughts.

1.) In politics you must canvas the area using data about the voters; in business you use demographic software to gather information about the customer.

2.) In politics you must get the voter to make a decision to vote for your candidate; in business you must get the consumer to choose your product or service over your competitor.

3.) In politics you must employ multiple methods to reach the voter; In business any good marketing program uses multiple media, mediums and methods to reach the consumer.

4.) In politics you must show how your candidate is better and different; In business you must show how your brand is best.

5.) In politics you must get those people to the polls to vote; in business you must get those customers in the door of your business to buy something.

6.) In politics you must win or you are forgotten; In business you must beat your competition and the customer must buy from you or you go out of business.

7.) In politics the customer decides with his or her vote; in business your voter buys your product or service with his or her dollar.

I hope this philosophical discussion allows you to see business from a different perspective and if you are in business and considering politics, forget it. Business is a much better game than politics and as a politician might say; You Can Trust Me on This in 2006.

Separation of Business and Politics

In the heat of the election season and as a life-long political junkie, I can't wait for election night. It is always one of the biggest nights of the year around my house. Glued to multiple TV's, tuned to every station (and now the Internet) I watch the returns roll in. Depending upon your investment in the campaign, the emotional highs and lows intensify. It's even better to be at a party. Some friends ask why I don't wait until the next morning to read the headlines. Would you turn off the TV before the end of the big game and find out the score tomorrow? This is an important political year full of excitement, so it's easy to be engaged. We're probably finding more people expressing their opinions about politics than ever before. But what about doing this at the workplace?

Political expression comes in a lot of forms. I have to admit I got a little uneasy when I pulled into my office parking lot and saw a bumper sticker that said something derogatory about meat-eaters. Now, I don't have anything against my vegetarian friends, yet I do like a nice steak now and then. What might people think about the opinions displayed at work? Might they be offended?

What about expressing strong political opinions in a small office environment to co-workers and clients? Unless you're working in the campaign office or at the legislature, this might have its limits. I did a little research on how well the workplace tolerates political discussions. We know that public employees (and many who work for private companies) have to adhere to specific guidelines. Those rules may include personal use of company computers and the wearing or distribution of political materials. In general, private, at-will employers have a great deal of latitude in how they manage their workplaces and what political tone they choose to set.

Even if the flexibility exists for employers, politics in the workplace can bring about workplace politics. There is some basic etiquette one can use to keep tensions down. How you handle yourself may depend if you're in management or not. There appears to be a tolerance for conversations among co-workers, but managers are held to a different standard. A national survey conducted in May and June 2007 by Harris Interactive, found that nearly one out of four U.S. workers says they are uncomfortable when their top managers openly express their political preferences at work. More than a quarter of those polled said they don't fit in with their company's culture in terms of politics. The survey found generational differences between younger and older workers regarding talking politics at work. Seventy-six percent of younger employees (age 18-34) would share their political views, compared to 64% of those age 50+. Eight-four percent of younger employees were comfortable telling their boss which candidates they support. This is compared to 68% of older workers who would do the same.

So do you tip-toe around your passion for R's or D's? How can you inspire an excitement for politics at work while not creating unnecessary tensions? At a very minimum, you can create an environment that values voting. It is not inappropriate to inquire is employees or coworkers need registration information. If the outcome of certain ballot measures could affect your business or clients that could also be acceptable for discussion. Alerting family, friends and co-workers to important debates, forums or community meetings may also create involvement and engagement without appearing bias. If you're in a politically charged environment that can be exciting, but what's most important is that you vote, your vote is yours, it's private and it's important. I hope you'll mail in your ballot and be part of this great process. Remember, on election night don't call, I'll be busy, unless you're having a party.....

The Business and Government Leadership Rift - Jobs and Political Rhetoric Discussed

We keep hearing how the President Obama and the Democrats in Congress are going to provide jobs for Americans. They tell us that as we switch to alternative energy they will provide millions of jobs, but that is simply poppycock and nonsense. The reality is that wind power and solar combined is only 1% of our total usage, and they haven't told you that it took 3-decades to get to that point. The leadership tells us how their stimulus and bailouts will help revive employment, that's utter nonsense, and let me explain.

If you will recall the US Government had bailed out Wall Street to re-capitalize the banks and to unfreeze credit markets, but very few banks are lending to small businesses, the real job creators. You see, 80% of Americans are employed by small business not large US corporation. Still, the President continually has business round tables with big business not little ones. Worse, in one recent business and jobs meeting there were no CEOs there at all, actually no small business owners either. In fact, no one who'd ever had to make a payroll was there in the room at all.

Recall that the Obama Administration promised Americans healthcare, an entitlement and still claimed that we'd lower medical costs, insurance, and save Medicare. In my opinion that's nuts, and I say; "what a bunch of malarkey indeed." Health care costs continue to sky rocket, an emergency room visit with NO operation is $7500 for only 3-4 hours, most of that is usually spent waiting in line. Sure health care insurance can pick up the tab, but that means higher insurance for everyone.

President Obama's solution; simple theaten Health Care Insurance companies that he'll increase regulations and audits if they raise premiums? Catch-22 for them, but that can only work so long. A business that cannot raise prises as costs skyrocket cannot stay in business. Are we going to bail them out too? And with whose money may I ask? And if we go to a completely government run health care insurance plan, we already know what will happen; they will spend 45% in the administration of the bureaucracy before one dollar is spent on actual health care costs. That 45% is pretty much straight across the board in all government agencies, I am not making this up or throwing out numbers from my underpants here.

And when it comes to trade President Obama claims he is on top of things? "Oh really," I ask? He claims he will increase our exports three-fold? Sure, our exports will increase three-fold as the global economy returns but our inflows of products will also increase, by more than increase 5-fold. That's just slightly higher than they were prior to the Global economic meltdown. Thus, the trade deficits will be a nightmare, and job recovery is wishful thinking. The reality is that the Obama Administration [in my observation, opinion, and from my point-of-view] is a complete nightmare to free-enterprise and industry, and utter failure in creating jobs in my opinion [just look at all the charts]. Many who were unemployed and whose unemployment benefits ran out have stopped looking for jobs.

Why? Well, we either made them weak by giving them free fishes rather than teaching them to fish or, there just are not any jobs, they know it and reason that it is a waste of their time to try. Meanwhile, small businesses are not hiring to any large degree. Again why should they with all the uncertainty. Big Parma is the latest to take their production overseas to South Korea and China, and President Obama is going to re-sign the South Korea trade treaty, but why - it has always been lopsided and unbalanced trade. How does that help jobs in America?Am I overdoing it here? Am I too over the top with condemnation for the performance of the Obama Administration you ask? Certainly not, and it's not just me who is stating this anymore, there are hundreds of articles in the mainstream media every day on this reality - it's no secret.

You see, I've been carefully clipping various articles, real data, and putting it against those speeches and by the Obama Administration's, Democrats in Congress, and reading the actual teleprompter scripts from President Obama himself. Turns out, hardly any of this political rhetoric is reality based, it's just a lot of PR with very little viable leadership in my opinion. No you are not surprised, nor am I naive enough to believe anything will ever change regardless of who gets into office. Still, we all know that it's not working, as we all have friends and/or neighbors, acquaintances who do not have jobs.

Our current leadership in my opinion is unfit to lead, and these speeches have run their course and are now ineffectual. You and I should not be fooled, and so, we aren't; neither are most Americans, and the best thing the Obama Administration can do at this point is to get out of the way. Let's help them do that, let's vote them out of office along with all the Democrat Leadership in Congress. Please consider all this.

**Below I put together some reading material for you, so you know I am not blowing smoke and this is not purely a political hit piece. It's just the way I see it, after reviewing the situation. Each of these articles contains bits and pieces to the puzzle and the truth, (I say pieces because we all realize we cannot believe everything in the news, just like we cannot believe everything our politicians tell us at the podium). I hope you will do your own research and consider what I am saying.

References:

  1. LA Times; "Hiring at Small Businesses the Usual Engine of Growth, Sputters" [showing how things are not working as planned].
  2. Editorial by Daniel Henninger in his weekly column Wonder Land; "Obama and the Spending Volcano" [a slamming article that cuts through Obama's teleprompting rhetoric and eloquent speeches].
  3. USA Today; "Doctors Limit New Medicare Patients; Surveys point to payment concerns" [shortages in health care getting worse, the opposite of what Obama intended].
  4. USA Today; "New RN Grads Feel Squeeze for Jobs - Economy Hits Flow of Nurses in System" [showing how economy is hurting even the industries propped up by socialism and partially funded through our tax dollars, nothing is working].
  5. WSJ; "President's Jobs Push Shifts to Exports" [article shows it's not working].
  6. WSJ; "Politics, Personality Fuel Rift Between CEOs, Obama" [article explains the mistrust, uncertainty, and anger from the business community and low confidence of CEOs].
  7. WSJ; "Unemployment Benefits Aren't Stimulus" [a reality check on Obama-nomics].
  8. Wall Street Journal; "Merck to Shut 16 Sites in Cost Move" July 9, 2010 [moving jobs to India for making the drugs].
  9. Wall Street Journal; "New Detroit Rises in India's South" July 8, 2010 [US Automakers, including those who were bailed out move manufacturing overseas not only to sell in those markets but to save costs].